showed a trendp ≈0.05
90%; p < 0.05; OR = 2.32; 1.34–4.03; p < 0.05) (Table 3b ) and showed a trend toward higher effectiveness with Triple‐AL (92.5% vs. 86%; p ≈0.05).
90%; p < 0.05; OR = 2.32; 1.34–4.03; p < 0.05) (Table 3b ) and showed a trend toward higher effectiveness with Triple‐AL (92.5% vs. 86%; p ≈0.05).