Impact of Visual Masking on Attentional Bias in Cross-Sectional Clinical and Healthy Populations: Differences in Conscious and Unconscious Processing of Alcohol-Related Cues.

Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken) · 2026 · PMC13053913 · PMID 41943269

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0570

closest p · 1.1× alpha

0.0570

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = 0.057so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The interaction between Congruency × Subgroup was marginally significant, F (1, 58) = 3.78, p = 0.057, η 2 = 0.061, indicating that the congruency effect might differ systematically across the two masking conditions.

also in 26,082 other papers

approached significanceno p-value reported

Notably, a Masking × Congruency interaction approached significance in the clinical AUD group, but not in controls.

also in 8,237 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.