highly significantP = 9.06 × 10 −18
The comparison ATA + versus ACA + and ARA + subgroups was highly significant ( P = 9.06 × 10 −18 , P = 2.88 × 10 −9 ), emphasizing C4A impact in ATA + patients (Figure 1 ).
The comparison ATA + versus ACA + and ARA + subgroups was highly significant ( P = 9.06 × 10 −18 , P = 2.88 × 10 −9 ), emphasizing C4A impact in ATA + patients (Figure 1 ).
Conversely, C4B showed a significant association in ACA + patients (OR = 1.20, P = 1.61 × 10 −6 ) and ARA + patients (OR = 1.26, P = 0.012) (Figure 1 ), but the comparison between ATA + and ACA + groups did not reach statistical significance (Figure 1 ).