MAIC results were similar, also suggesting comparable rates of CR (OR 1.12; 95% CI 0.61–2.08) and CR + CRh (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.46–1.50) between treatments; the adjusted point estimate indicated a numerical trend in favor of olutasidenib for CR and ivosidenib for CR + CRh but was not statistically significant.
← all excerpts
Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Olutasidenib and Ivosidenib in Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1-Mutated Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
2
—
—
The sentences
The median DoCR for olutasidenib after matching was 21.3 months (95% CI 12.0 to NE) and while the point estimate was still greater than the median DoCR for ivosidenib (difference in medians: 11.18 months; 95% CI − 4.30 to 22.72), the benefit for olutasidenib versus ivosidenib in terms of the difference in medians did not reach statistical significance.