Although Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) values were numerically higher in the intervention groups across studies, these differences did not reach statistical significance (Khdour 2009: 22 1.19 vs 1.05, p = 0.13; Jarab 2012: 23 1.15 vs 1.06, p = 0.55).
← all excerpts
Pharmacist-Led Integrated Management for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
1
0.1300
0.1300