marginally significantp = 0.075
0.363), resulting in a lower mean HR at T3 for the sliding group (1.955 ± 0.624) compared to the gamified group (2.331 ± 0.685), showing a marginally significant difference [ t (28) = 1.829, p = 0.075].
0.363), resulting in a lower mean HR at T3 for the sliding group (1.955 ± 0.624) compared to the gamified group (2.331 ± 0.685), showing a marginally significant difference [ t (28) = 1.829, p = 0.075].
However, based on the actual experimental measurements, although the data itself showed a trend consistent with theoretical expectations, statistical analysis revealed that HRV indices (rMSSD and LF) did not show statistically significant changes.