Comparative Evaluation of Bovine- and Porcine-Derived Xenografts in Rabbit Calvarial and Canine Mandibular Dehiscence Models.

45.9 ± 1.1%, p = 0.208), whereas residual graft showed a numerical trend toward higher values with A-Oss (20.2 ± 3.5% vs. 13.3 ± 4.5%, p = 0.069).

also in 1,012 other papers

In this contained defect environment, the between-material differences at each time point were small and did not reach statistical significance, suggesting that early-to-intermediate mineralized tissue fill was comparable for the two xenografts under the present protocol. 4.3.

also in 111,027 other papers