Similarly, despite the higher probability rates of DFS and GFRS observed in the hybrid group than the preemptive group, these differences did not reach statistical significance (61.38% (95% CI: 42.91-75.46) vs. 56.1% (95% CI: 40.54-69.07), P= 0.55 for DFS and 33.83% (95% CI: 17.66-50.79) vs. 13.28% (95% CI: 5.09-25.44), P= 0.10 for GRFS).
← all excerpts
Hybrid Ganciclovir/Valacyclovir Prophylaxis Reduces CMV Reactivation in High-Risk Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients.
1
0.5500
0.5500