Consistently, the HRs from the adjusted model for the comparison of ET versus ribociclib (HR = 1.288; 95%‐CI: [1.006; 1.649]) or CT versus ribociclib (HR = 1.776; 95%‐CI: [1.377; 2.290]) were in favor of ribociclib, and the related 95%‐CIs indicated nominally significant differences.
← all excerpts
Real-world progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with HR<sup>+</sup>/HER2<sup>-</sup> advanced breast cancer treated in first-line with ribociclib, endocrine monotherapy or chemotherapy: Results from the observational RIBANNA study.
1
—
—