highly significantp < 0.00001
Subgroup analysis was highly significant ( p < 0.00001, I2 = 94.1%), clarifying that digital exercise improved ASMI compared to “maintain original lifestyle” but was comparable to “offline exercise”.
Subgroup analysis was highly significant ( p < 0.00001, I2 = 94.1%), clarifying that digital exercise improved ASMI compared to “maintain original lifestyle” but was comparable to “offline exercise”.
While Egger’s test did not reach statistical significance for most outcomes, visual asymmetry in funnel plots for handgrip strength and ASMI introduces an additional layer of caution; we cannot rule out the possibility that the overall effect estimates are somewhat optimistic due to unpublished null findings [ 85 ].