borderline significantp = 0.042
Finally, the type of PCAT attenuation used showed a borderline significant effect (QM(df = 1) = 4.15, p = 0.042).
Finally, the type of PCAT attenuation used showed a borderline significant effect (QM(df = 1) = 4.15, p = 0.042).
The borderline significance favoring the FAI over mean attenuation ( p = 0.042) should be interpreted with caution given the multiple comparisons performed.
The effect size was most pronounced in cohorts with unspecified ACS, while it did not reach statistical significance in the limited number of studies focused solely on AMI.