Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Lesion formation and impedance dependence of v-HPSD ablation (QDOT-MICRO™) versus conventional power-control (SmartTouch™ SF): a head-to-head comparison in an ex vivo porcine model.

BMC Cardiovasc Disord · 2026 · PMC13214096 · PMID 41963806

3
hedged sentences
0.0010
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.0970
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantP < 0.001actually significant
The ablation mode and impedance level demonstrated a significant interaction, which differentially affected the lesion parameters: highly significant for maximum depth and mean volume ( P < 0.001), significant for superficial diameter (P < 0.05), and non-significant for maximum diameter (P = 0.587).

also in 132,142 other papers

marginally significantp = 0.076so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
For lesion volume, the interaction was marginally significant (F2,5.980 = 4.085, p = 0.076), while for maximum diameter, no significant interaction was observed ( p = 0.589).Given the significant interaction effects observed for superficial diameter, depth, and volume, simple effects analyses were performed.

also in 26,082 other papers

did not reach statistical significancep =0.097so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
Although the mean lesion volume was larger in the PC group, this difference did not reach statistical significance (74.08±30.02 mm3 vs. 65.98±21.99 mm3, p =0.097).

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.