highly significantp < 0.001
In Shams et al., the differences were highly significant ( p < 0.001 for both CS and ASES), while in Tanpowpong et al., significance was also observed (CS: p = 0.02, ASES: p = 0.002).
In Shams et al., the differences were highly significant ( p < 0.001 for both CS and ASES), while in Tanpowpong et al., significance was also observed (CS: p = 0.02, ASES: p = 0.002).
However, the comparison between groups did not reach statistical significance (CS, p = 0.664; ASES, p = 0.301; VAS, p = 0.463).