Glymphatic-related imaging findings in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis of DTI-ALPS studies.

Front Aging Neurosci · 2026 · PMC13233433 · PMID 42253367

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0470

closest p · 0.9× alpha

0.0470

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = 0.047actually significant

Even in the post-hoc sensitivity analysis, which yielded a marginally significant pooled effect for the complicated subgroup ( p = 0.047), the between-subgroup contrast remained non-significant ( p = 0.141).

also in 26,082 other papers

did not reach statistical significanceno p-value reported

In the primary analysis of complicated T2DM ( k = 3), the pooled Hedges’ g was −1.34 [95% CI (−3.55, +0.86), HKSJ-adjusted; p = 0.119; I 2 = 90.7%], and did not reach statistical significance.

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.