nominally significantp = 0.016
In Period 1–6, the SIDD subgroup had 12% (2; 22) lower HOMA2-B value (reflecting insulin secretion at fasting) than controls ( ESM Figure S6B, S21 ), but the difference was only nominally significant (p = 0.016).
In Period 1–6, the SIDD subgroup had 12% (2; 22) lower HOMA2-B value (reflecting insulin secretion at fasting) than controls ( ESM Figure S6B, S21 ), but the difference was only nominally significant (p = 0.016).