Context-dependent asymmetries in intertemporal decision-making: a comparative study of substance use disorder and control groups.

Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy · 2026 · PMC13244943 · PMID 42021354

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0010

closest p · 0.0× alpha

0.5800

boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp <.001actually significant

Most critically, the Group × Condition interaction—the key finding of context-dependent decision-making—remained highly significant (OR = 0.50, 95%CI[0.40,0.62], p <.001), though somewhat attenuated compared to the full sample (OR = 0.39).

also in 132,142 other papers

marginal significancep =.089so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

In gain contexts, although the SUD group showed higher discount rates (M = 4.40) than controls (M = 4.37), this difference reached only marginal significance ( p =.089), suggesting a trend toward immediate reward preference.

also in 5,069 other papers

did not reach statistical significancep =.580not close (p > 0.1)

In the analysis of group effects, the main effect between the substance use disorder (SUD) group and the control group did not reach statistical significance (OR = 1.19, 95% CI [0.65, 2.17], p =.580).

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.