highly significantp < 0.001
The statistical comparisons between the two were highly significant (F = 543.101 and F = 645.338, p < 0.001), further supporting the therapeutic action of the material in Group 3 (Table 1 - see PDF).
The statistical comparisons between the two were highly significant (F = 543.101 and F = 645.338, p < 0.001), further supporting the therapeutic action of the material in Group 3 (Table 1 - see PDF).
Although Group 3 also demonstrated the best results under the explorer scratching method, the intergroup differences did not reach statistical significance.