borderline significantp = 0.047
For working memory, exercise demonstrated a borderline significant improvement (SMD = 0.20, 95% CI 0.00–0.39, Z = 1.99, p = 0.047), with no evidence of heterogeneity (I 2 = 0%).
For working memory, exercise demonstrated a borderline significant improvement (SMD = 0.20, 95% CI 0.00–0.39, Z = 1.99, p = 0.047), with no evidence of heterogeneity (I 2 = 0%).
Although most pairwise comparisons in the league table had 95% CrIs crossing the null, AE showed a favorable trend compared with PC (SMD = 0.36, 95% CrI 0.00–0.77) and AC (SMD = 0.45, 95% CrI 0.07–0.88).
Subgroup results for working memory were also unstable: apart from the supervised intervention subgroup showing a significant improvement, most other strata did not reach statistical significance.