a trend toward significancep = 0.062
The differences between good and poor responders in this subgroup were statistically significant for DFS ( p = 0.004) and OS ( p = 0.047), with a trend toward significance for LR ( p = 0.062) ( Figure 4 ).
The differences between good and poor responders in this subgroup were statistically significant for DFS ( p = 0.004) and OS ( p = 0.047), with a trend toward significance for LR ( p = 0.062) ( Figure 4 ).
Clearance of mrMRF was associated with more favorable DFS and OS, whereas the corresponding associations for mrEMVI and mrTD did not reach statistical significance ( Supplementary Tables S2 and S3 ).