highly significantP < .001
In Shams et al, the differences were highly significant ( P < .001 for both CS and ASES), while Tanpowpong et al also observed significant improvements (CS: P = .02, ASES: P = .002).
In Shams et al, the differences were highly significant ( P < .001 for both CS and ASES), while Tanpowpong et al also observed significant improvements (CS: P = .02, ASES: P = .002).
Similarly, Akbaba and Aksan Sadigoklu indicate that their results did not reach statistical significance.