showed a trendP =0.09
In the ablation cohort, resting HR was significantly higher from index to follow‐up CPET (66±3 versus 69±2, P =0.01) whereas peak exercise HR showed a trend toward reduction after preablation (162±5 versus 154±3, P =0.09).
In the ablation cohort, resting HR was significantly higher from index to follow‐up CPET (66±3 versus 69±2, P =0.01) whereas peak exercise HR showed a trend toward reduction after preablation (162±5 versus 154±3, P =0.09).