At the model level (Figure 7a ), nominally significant group differences were observed for the repeat data and BrainSurfGCN, with above‐average performers showing higher correlation differences than below‐average performers; however, these effects did not survive FDR correction, potentially reflecting limited statistical power.
← all excerpts
Efficient Deep Learning Models for Predicting Individualized Task Activation From Resting-State Functional Connectivity.
2
—
—
The sentences
At the task level, only two contrasts, Working Memory: 2‐Back Body and Working Memory: 2‐Back Place, showed borderline significance after correction, with higher correlation differences in the above‐average group.