Barriers, Facilitators, and Intention to Use AI for Breast Cancer Diagnosis: Mixed Methods Study Among Austrian Physicians With and Without AI Experience.

J Med Internet Res · 2026 · PMC13291731 · PMID 42262843

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0700

closest p · 1.4× alpha

0.1000

boldest claim

The sentences

did not reach statistical significanceP =.07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Conversely, although the association did not reach statistical significance ( P =.07), perceiving 2 or more barriers to AI adoption was associated with a trend toward less favorable attitudes (B=–0.501, SE=0.268), indicating that concerns about risks, implementation challenges, or ethical issues may influence clinicians’ views.

also in 111,027 other papers

marginally significantP ≤.1so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

For the likelihood of future AI use, the coefficient for female physicians was negative (B=–0.856; P =.08), which is not significant at the conventional α of 0.05 level but would be considered marginally significant at a liberal threshold of P ≤.1.

also in 26,082 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.