Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Risk factors for nosocomial infections in ECMO patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Front Public Health · 2026 · PMC13294189 · PMID 42368961

4
hedged sentences
0.0010
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.0570
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp ≤ 0.001actually significant
Both Egger’s test (bias = 2.588, t = 5.72) and Begg’s test (z = 3.27, continuity corrected) were highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001), and the funnel plot displayed an asymmetric distribution, indicating significant publication bias ( Supplementary Figure S3 ).

also in 82,236 other papers

a marginal trendp = 0.057so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
The pooled OR for hypertension was not significant, and the pooled risk ratio (RR) also did not reach significance but showed a marginal trend (RR = 1.37, p = 0.057).

also in 456 other papers

a possible trendno p-value reported
The pooled result suggested a possible trend toward a higher infection risk with the VAV mode, but this did not reach statistical significance (OR = 3.66, 95% CI 0.70–19.15, p = 0.126).

also in 939 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.