Together with the magnitude of the observed odds ratios, this suggests that the statistically significant findings are robust to conservative correction, while the limited sample size primarily increases the risk of Type II error for outcomes that did not reach statistical significance, rather than inflation of observed effects.
← all excerpts
Response to a commentary "Comment on "Collateral damage: Cardiovascular and respiratory implications of tear gas deployment during peaceful protest": Caution in interpreting the reported associations".
1
—
—