51.48%, P = 0.036), while the difference compared with the rFSH+HMG group did not reach statistical significance in unadjusted analyses (59.78% vs. 52.99%, P = 0.102).
← all excerpts
Luteinizing hormone supplementation and cumulative live birth rate in assisted reproductive technology cycles among women of advanced reproductive age.
1
0.1020
0.1020