borderline significantp = 0.05
This association was borderline significant after adjustment (adjusted OR: 3.73; 95% CI: 0.97–14.35; p = 0.05).
This association was borderline significant after adjustment (adjusted OR: 3.73; 95% CI: 0.97–14.35; p = 0.05).
Although oral health practice continued to show a negative association with poorer outcomes (adjusted β = −0.25), the relationship did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.11), reflecting a trend toward a protective effect that warrants further exploration.
However, the latter showed a trend toward significance in the adjusted model, suggesting a potential positive influence of health education.