The calculated binding energies showed a clear trend, with Rh@Py-OMe (−25.5 eV) exhibiting the strongest binding, followed by Rh@Py-H (−21.3 eV), and then Rh@Py-OH (−13.1 eV) (Fig. 5 ).
← all excerpts
Mechanochemical synthesis of pincer nanotraps for efficient rhodium recovery.
1
—
—