highly significantp < 0.001
Critically, the interaction was highly significant ( β = 0.29, Z = 4.07, p < 0.001, 95% CI = 0.15–0.44), indicating that the slope linking CsPIP output to subjective intensity differed across conditions.
Critically, the interaction was highly significant ( β = 0.29, Z = 4.07, p < 0.001, 95% CI = 0.15–0.44), indicating that the slope linking CsPIP output to subjective intensity differed across conditions.
Notably, the traditional NPS failed to reach statistical significance in capturing this effect ( r = 0.34, p = 0.063), highlighting a stronger predictive performance by CsPIP.