weakly significantp = 0.04
The reduction in NHEJ from rad54 in cross 1 is only weakly significant ( p = 0.04) and could be spurious.
The reduction in NHEJ from rad54 in cross 1 is only weakly significant ( p = 0.04) and could be spurious.
All ten of these comparisons—including five in cross 2 and five in cross 1—showed a highly significant reduction in NHEJ frequency.