Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Transparent meta-analysis of prospective memory and aging.

PLoS One · 2008 · PMC2242851 · PMID 18286167

2
hedged sentences
closest p
boldest claim

The sentences

failed to reach significanceno p-value reported
In contrast, under naturalistic conditions, older adults perform better than younger adults on prospective memory tasks that have been investigated: time-cued prospective memory proper ( d = 0.53) and time-cued habitual prospective memory ( d = 0.76) and age improvements appear larger on time-cued habitual prospective memory versus time-cued prospective memory proper but this difference failed to reach significance ( d difference = −0.23, bootstrap 95% CI = (0.51,0.02)).

also in 4,113 other papers

Moreover, age declines are also larger on time-cued vigilance ( d = −0.95) than event-cued vigilance ( d = −0.77) but this difference failed to reach statistical significance ( d difference = −0.18, bootstrap 95% CI = (−0.47,0.03)).

also in 6,035 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.