Family history and risk of lung cancer: age-at-diagnosis in cases and first-degree relatives.

Br J Cancer · 2006 · PMC2360569 · PMID 17003779

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0700

closest p · 1.4× alpha

0.0700

boldest claim

The sentences

borderline significantP =0.07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Borderline significant differences were observed for exposure to ETS at work ( P =0.07).

also in 11,409 other papers

a significant trendno p-value reported

Although there was a significant trend of increasing risk with numbers of affected relatives ( Table 1 ), there was no significant effect of family history (any vs none) of lung cancer in the study population overall or in late-onset cases, regardless of the age of affected relatives.

also in 9,775 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.