Priming, response learning and repetition suppression.

Neuropsychologia · 2008 · PMC2430995 · PMID 18328508

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0800

closest p · 1.6× alpha

0.1300

boldest claim

The sentences

approached significancep = .08so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

5 ; though we note the switch cost correlation in the fusiform approached significance, p = .08).

also in 8,237 other papers

did not quite reach significancep = .09so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Although the difference between the Same and Reverse conditions did not quite reach significance when collapsing across stimulus, t (11) = 1.89, p = .09, the decrease in priming for the Reverse condition was significant when the analysis was restricted to Complete objects, t (11) = 1.89, p < .05, consistent with previous findings ( Dobbins et al., 2004; Schnyer et al., 2006 ).

also in 350 other papers

failed to reach significancep = .13not close (p > 0.1)

This result reproduces the Task-by-Repetition interaction in this region found in the whole-brain analysis, and was further confirmed by pairwise t -tests across conditions, which showed significantly less RS for the Orthogonal compared to both the Same, t (17) = 5.51, p < .001, and Reverse, t (17) = 2.12, p < .05, conditions (any difference between the Same and Reverse condition failed to reach significance, t (17) = 1.14, p = .13).

also in 4,113 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.