Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Electrophysiological correlates of masked face priming.

Neuroimage · 2008 · PMC2516482 · PMID 18234522

3
hedged sentences
0.0700
closest p · 1.4× alpha
0.0700
boldest claim

The sentences

approached significancep = .07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
The 3 × 2 omnibus ANOVA showed reliable main effects of priming condition, F (1.96,21.5) = 9.49, p < .001, and of familiarity, F (1,11) = 22.4, p < .001, and an interaction that approached significance, F (1.99,21.9) = 2.97, p = .07.

also in 5,257 other papers

a numerical trendno p-value reported
The amplitude pattern for the early effect resembled that found in our previous fMRI study, in that it was found for both familiar and unfamiliar faces, though there was a significant modulation by view (with greater deflections for same than different views, at least for familiar faces), which was only a numerical trend in our fMRI data.

also in 723 other papers

For the late global repetition effect for familiar faces, the intercept did not quite reach significance (95%CI = − 0.04 to 1.67), though there was no indication that the size of the effect increased with higher d ′ values.

also in 198 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.