Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Association analysis of variation in/near FTO, CDKAL1, SLC30A8, HHEX, EXT2, IGF2BP2, LOC387761, and CDKN2B with type 2 diabetes and related quantitative traits in Pima Indians.

Diabetes · 2009 · PMC2628623 · PMID 19008344

3
hedged sentences
0.0600
closest p · 1.2× alpha
0.0900
boldest claim

The sentences

a nonsignificant trendP = 0.06so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
Similarly, an increased number of risk alleles had a nonsignificant trend toward increased insulin sensitivity as assessed by the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp ( P = 0.06).

also in 5,406 other papers

an elevated trendP = 0.09so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
The reduced 30-min insulin response resulted an elevated trend for plasma glucose levels at 60 min (dominant P = 0.09, adjusted for age, sex, and percent body fat; Fig. 1 C ).

also in 278 other papers

nominally significantno p-value reported
For the additional tag SNPs, however, this may not be the case, and none of the nominally significant results reported here would remain significant if a Bonferroni correction for the 31 tag SNPs were applied.

also in 7,732 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.