showed a trendp = 0.069
NT-proCNP plasma levels of UM patients were significantly lower than HC ( p = 0.043) and SM still showed a trend towards lower NT-proCNP levels compared to HC ( p = 0.069).
NT-proCNP plasma levels of UM patients were significantly lower than HC ( p = 0.043) and SM still showed a trend towards lower NT-proCNP levels compared to HC ( p = 0.069).