The saccadic Stroop effect: Evidence for involuntary programming of eye movements by linguistic cues.

9, p < 0.05) and marginally significant differences between congruent versus neutral ( t = 1.87, p = 0.09) and neutral versus incongruent ( t = 1.89, p = 0.09) trial latencies across subjects 3.2 Saccade amplitude and direction No significant variation was found in the amplitude of the primary saccade dependent upon trial type (Congruent, Incongruent, Neutral) ( F (2, 18) = 0.067).

also in 26,082 other papers

Overall there was a trend for errors to have shorter latencies than correct responses (errors: 402 ms correct: 436 ms), but this difference did not reach statistical significance ( F (1, 9) = 2.72, p = 0.13).

also in 111,027 other papers