A1C levels In the FAS population, A1C levels were significantly reduced in both groups (PRT −0.81 ± 1.09%, P < 0.001; CSII −0.57 ± 0.94%, P < 0.001), but the difference in favor of the PRT group failed to reach statistical significance ( P = 0.087) ( Fig. 1 A ).
← all excerpts
Incremental value of continuous glucose monitoring when starting pump therapy in patients with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes: the RealTrend study.
2
0.0870
0.0870
The sentences
In the per protocol population, TDDs increased between baseline and 1 month (by 6.1 ± 9.5 units in the PRT group and by 1.7 ± 7.6 units in the CSII group; P = 0.028), but the difference, although of comparable magnitude, failed to reach significance at 3 and 6 months.