Better than expected or as bad as you thought? The neurocognitive development of probabilistic feedback processing.

Front Hum Neurosci · 2009 · PMC2816174 · PMID 20140268

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0500

closest p · 1.0× alpha

0.7500

boldest claim

The sentences

approached significancep = 0.05actually significant

Left parietal cortex The (age group × valence × rule) ANOVA for the left parietal cortex revealed a similar three-way interaction which approached significance, F (2, 64) = 3.16, p = 0.05 (see Figure 2 B).

also in 8,237 other papers

failed to reach significancep = 0.75not close (p > 0.1)

dACC The (age group × valence × rule) ANOVA for the dACC resulted in a rule × valence interaction, F (2, 64) = 14.14, p < 0.001, an age × valence interaction, F (2, 64) = 4.11, p < 0.01, and an age × rule interaction, F (2, 64) = 4.81, p = 0.03, but the three-way interaction failed to reach significance F (2, 64) = 0.28, p = 0.75.

also in 4,113 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.