Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Monitoring great ape and elephant abundance at large spatial scales: measuring effectiveness of a conservation landscape.

PLoS One · 2010 · PMC2859051 · PMID 20428233

4
hedged sentences
0.0004
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.0620
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp = 0.0004actually significant
Across survey strata, the availability of closed-understory terra firma forest (as measured on transects) was the sole and highly significant habitat predictor of elephant density (Elephant density = 0.00004 closed understory forest −0.1159; R 2 = 0.93; p = 0.0004).

also in 132,142 other papers

weakly significantp = 0.0454actually significant
Availability of forest clearings was a weakly significant predictor of gorilla nest density at the stratum level (Gorilla nest density = 0.008626 Clearing + 0.049705, R 2 = 0.58; p = 0.0454).

also in 1,387 other papers

approached but did not reach significancep = 0.062so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
The lowest elephant densities were found in the LTCR and Mokabi, which were both significantly lower than densities recorded in NNNP and Kabo and showed a similar trend for Pokola, that approached but did not reach significance (LTCR: p = 0.062, Mokabi: p = 0.058).

also in 210 other papers

a positive trendno p-value reported
The availability of closed understory terra firma forest and forest clearings both showed a positive trend with gorilla nest density across management units.

also in 11,005 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.