highly significantp<0.001
These differences were reflected in the one-way ANOVA and Kruskal–Wallis tests, which remained highly significant (p<0.001) even after correction for multiple comparisons ( Table 2 ).
These differences were reflected in the one-way ANOVA and Kruskal–Wallis tests, which remained highly significant (p<0.001) even after correction for multiple comparisons ( Table 2 ).
Bar charts for WHODAS-II and chronic disease groups show a clear trend towards worsening PGC morale rating with increasing disability from chronic illness ( Figure 2A, 2B ).