Effect of reinforcement history on hand choice in an unconstrained reaching task.

Front Neurosci · 2011 · PMC3066466 · PMID 21472031

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0520

closest p · 1.0× alpha

0.0520

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = 0.052so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The effect for the TAX condition was marginally significant [ t (13) = 1.75, p = 0.052].

also in 26,082 other papers

showed a trendno p-value reported

Experiment 2 Although we did not observe a differential effect of increasing and decreasing the rate of positive reinforcement in Experiment 1, the data showed a trend for a larger effect of BOOST in the post-manipulation phase, the condition in which the left hand reward rate was increased.

also in 53,322 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.