Incongruence in doping related attitudes, beliefs and opinions in the context of discordant behavioural data: in which measure do we trust?

PLoS One · 2011 · PMC3082532 · PMID 21541317

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0620

closest p · 1.2× alpha

0.0620

boldest claim

The sentences

borderline significancep = .062so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

A statistically significant difference was found between admitted doping users and non-users in explicit attitude (p<.001) and social projection of doping use (p = .024), with a borderline significance for pressure to use doping (p = .062).

also in 7,017 other papers

did not reach statistical significanceno p-value reported

Albeit the differences in latency or D-scores did not reach statistical significance, the sample means suggest that performance on the BIAT was revealing for deniers.

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.