Social attitudes differentially modulate imitation in adolescents and adults.

Exp Brain Res · 2011 · PMC3102210 · PMID 21336831

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0510

closest p · 1.0× alpha

0.0700

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantP = 0.051so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The same ANOVA performed on the Effector Priming Task revealed a marginally significant effect of Age Group F (1,83) = 3.9, P = 0.051) but the main effect of Prime Group and the Prime x Age Group interaction was not significant (both F (1,83) < 1).

also in 26,082 other papers

approached significanceP = 0.07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The three-way interaction between Prime Group (Pro-social, Non-social), Age Group (Adolescent, Adult) and Experimental Task (Imitation task, Effector Priming Control task) approached significance ( F ( F (1,86) = 2.22, P = 0.07, 1-tailed).

also in 8,237 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.