showed a trendP = 0.10
Despite the small number of REL subjects, the average loading parameters of IC M 1 were significantly different between HC and REL ( t 140 = 2.27, P < 0.05) and showed a trend for IC M 4 ( t 140 = 1.68, P = 0.10).
Despite the small number of REL subjects, the average loading parameters of IC M 1 were significantly different between HC and REL ( t 140 = 2.27, P < 0.05) and showed a trend for IC M 4 ( t 140 = 1.68, P = 0.10).