Comparison of the Protocols The image quality was insufficient for analysis using both protocols in three patients and in four additional patients using protocol 2, but the difference in the rate of insufficient scans between the two protocols did not reach statistical significance (3 in protocol 1 versus 7 in protocol 2, p = 0.17).
← all excerpts
Myocardial area at risk and salvage measured by T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance: reproducibility and comparison of two T2-weighted protocols.
1
0.1700
0.1700