When the EZ-IO ® was compared to the BIG in 40 patients requiring in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation, IO access was established more often (90% versus 80%) and faster (1.8 ± 0.9 min versus 2.2 ± 1.0 min) with the EZ-IO ® , although these differences did not reach statistical significance [ 7 ].
← all excerpts
Efficacy of the EZ-IO needle driver for out-of-hospital intraosseous access--a preliminary, observational, multicenter study.
1
—
—