The time course of attention: selection is transient.

PLoS One · 2011 · PMC3220693 · PMID 22125619

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0010

closest p · 0.0× alpha

0.0700

boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp<.001actually significant

However, the effect of SOA was highly significant (F (4.8, 86.9) = 48.17, p<.001), as well as the interaction between group and SOA (F (4.8, 86.9) = 15.33, p<.001).

also in 132,142 other papers

approached significancep = .07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Again, the RT results (see Table 1 ) followed this pattern, as shown by the significant main effects (Distractor presence: F (1, 9) = 20.13, p<.01; SOA: F (1.82, 16.37) = 18.86, p<.001), and the interaction effect that now approached significance (F (4, 36) = 2.38, p = .07).

also in 8,237 other papers

failed to reach significanceno p-value reported

This narrowly failed to reach significance at Bonferroni corrected alpha levels, but since this serves as a replication of Experiment 1 (which was already replicated in Experiment 1b), we take this as evidence for a decline.

also in 4,113 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.