A comparison of the efficacy, safety, and longevity of two different hyaluronic acid dermal fillers in the treatment of severe nasolabial folds: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind, within-subject study.

Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol · 2011 · PMC3257885 · PMID 22253545

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0001

closest p · 0.0× alpha

0.0600

boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantP < 0.0001actually significant

When an analysis was conducted for subject preference for JUP versus PER only, this difference in favor of JUP was highly significant ( z = 4.76, P < 0.0001; Figure 3 ).

also in 132,142 other papers

a clear trendP = 0.06so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

At this clinic visit, this clinically relevant correction had been maintained in a significantly larger proportion of NLFs treated with JUP, as documented by the physicians (90% vs 65%; P < 0.0001), with a clear trend also evident based on the subjects’ independent scoring (83.8% vs 72.5%; P = 0.06).

also in 19,460 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.