highly significantp < 0.001
All correlations were highly significant ( p < 0.001), but there were differences in slope and offset between the two techniques, at least in part due to differences in calibration between the two techniques.
All correlations were highly significant ( p < 0.001), but there were differences in slope and offset between the two techniques, at least in part due to differences in calibration between the two techniques.
The difference in correlation between the parameters calculated using the two different methods of ROI placement at the NN on the QCT dataset did not reach statistical significance.